BR-O-11
An Invoice that contains a VAT breakdown group (BG-23) with a VAT category code (BT-118) "Not subject to VAT" shall not contain other VAT breakdown groups (BG-23).
What does this rule mean?
The invoice has a "not subject to VAT" (category O) breakdown alongside further VAT breakdowns.
Out of scope is not one category among others; it says this supply is outside VAT entirely. A second breakdown contradicts that.
- BG-23
- VAT breakdown (group)
- BT-118
- VAT category code (UNCL 5305)
Official rule message (standard)
An Invoice that contains a VAT breakdown group (BG-23) with a VAT category code (BT-118) "Not subject to VAT" shall not contain other VAT breakdown groups (BG-23).
Where the rule applies
Syntax: CII · UBL
The same rule, expressed twice: UBL and CII name the same fields with different paths. Running a CII file against the UBL rules is why you get errors that mean nothing.
UBL
/ubl:Invoice | /cn:CreditNote
CII
//rsm:SupplyChainTradeTransaction/ram:ApplicableHeaderTradeSettlement/ram:ApplicableTradeTax[ram:CategoryCode = 'O'][upper-case(ram:TypeCode) = 'VAT']
Technical test
The rule passes when this Schematron expression holds true:
not(//ram:ApplicableTradeTax[ram:CategoryCode != 'O'])How to fix it
Touches amounts, VAT or IBAN. We never change these automatically — correct them in your source data.
Split the transactions across two invoices — or assign the lines to the category that actually applies.
Correct the affected entry in your XML, then re-check the invoice. Validation runs locally in your browser — your file never leaves your machine.
Check an e-invoice here
Drop an XML or ZUGFeRD PDF file here. Validation runs locally in your browser against EN 16931 — your file never leaves your machine.