DK-R-007
For Danish suppliers DirectDebitMandateID and CreditorReferenceID are mandatory when payment means is 49
What does this rule mean?
With Danish payment means 49 the mandate or creditor reference is missing.
The Danish direct debit requires both DirectDebitMandateID and CreditorReferenceID.
Official rule message (standard)
For Danish suppliers DirectDebitMandateID and CreditorReferenceID are mandatory when payment means is 49
Where the rule applies
Syntax: CII · UBL
The same rule, expressed twice: UBL and CII name the same fields with different paths. Running a CII file against the UBL rules is why you get errors that mean nothing.
UBL
ubl-invoice:Invoice[$DKSupplierCountry = 'DK' and $DKCustomerCountry = 'DK']/cac:PaymentMeans
CII
rsm:CrossIndustryInvoice[$DKSupplierCountry = 'DK' and $DKCustomerCountry = 'DK']/rsm:SupplyChainTradeTransaction/ram:ApplicableHeaderTradeSettlement/ram:SpecifiedTradeSettlementPaymentMeans
Technical test
The rule passes when this Schematron expression holds true:
not((ram:TypeCode = '49')
and not((normalize-space(../ram:CreditorReferenceID/text()) != '')
and (normalize-space(ram:SpecifiedTradePaymentTerms/ram:DirectDebitMandateID/text()) != ''))
)How to fix it
A missing or incorrect business entry only you can supply. Add or correct it, then re-check.
Add the mandate reference and the creditor reference.
Correct the affected entry in your XML, then re-check the invoice. Validation runs locally in your browser — your file never leaves your machine.
Check an e-invoice here
Drop an XML or ZUGFeRD PDF file here. Validation runs locally in your browser against EN 16931 — your file never leaves your machine.