BR-CO-06
Document level charge reason code (BT-105) and Document level charge reason (BT-104) shall indicate the same type of charge.
What does this rule mean?
Document level charge reason code (BT-105) and Document level charge reason (BT-104) shall indicate the same type of charge.
A calculation/amount rule: the figures it names must reconcile arithmetically.
- BT-104
- Document level charge reason
- BT-105
- Document level charge reason code
Official rule message (standard)
Document level charge reason code (BT-105) and Document level charge reason (BT-104) shall indicate the same type of charge.
Where the rule applies
Syntax: CII · UBL
The same rule, expressed twice: UBL and CII name the same fields with different paths. Running a CII file against the UBL rules is why you get errors that mean nothing.
UBL
/ubl:Invoice/cac:AllowanceCharge[cbc:ChargeIndicator = true()] | /cn:CreditNote/cac:AllowanceCharge[cbc:ChargeIndicator = true()]
CII
//ram:ApplicableHeaderTradeSettlement/ram:SpecifiedTradeAllowanceCharge/ram:ChargeIndicator[udt:Indicator='true']
Technical test
The rule passes when this Schematron expression holds true:
true()How to fix it
Touches amounts, VAT or IBAN. We never change these automatically — correct them in your source data.
Check the affected amounts in your source data — amounts are never changed automatically.
Correct the affected entry in your XML, then re-check the invoice. Validation runs locally in your browser — your file never leaves your machine.
Check an e-invoice here
Drop an XML or ZUGFeRD PDF file here. Validation runs locally in your browser against EN 16931 — your file never leaves your machine.